uganda village project

hiv/aids

Background
 
From the beginning, Uganda Village Project has had special concern for the health issues in the Iganga District that result from the HIV/AIDS epidemic. We have conducted HIV prevention education projects, held free HIV testing clinics, and worked to support initiatives in peer education on the topic of HIV/AIDS. This summer, our fabulous HIV/AIDS resource guide group was made up of 10 students and other young people, including a Ugandan student from Makerere University. This group faced the difficult task of traveling to as many locations in the Iganga district as possible to search for those providing HIV/AIDS-related services.  They interviewed 25 different entities in Iganga district providing HIV/AIDS care and support to produce this resource guide.


Purpose

The purpose of this project was to identify the health centers and NGOs that were providing services in regards to HIV/AIDS. Uganda, although repeatedly cited as one of the few East African countries to combat the HIV epidemic through strict abstinence only programs, is a country with a rising incidence of HIV infection particularly among the younger population. In order to assess the types of HIV services provided by the NGOs operating in Igangatown, Uganda a resource guide was created. The resource guide lists NGOs and health centers according to sub-county.


The types of HIV services listed in the guide were the following:
1) Prevention of mother to child transmission – both education and distribution of the drug Nevirapine
2) Youth Education on prevention of HIV
3) Outreach programs in the form of classes, drama skits, written materials
4) Home-based care
5) Income generating projects
6) Orphan Support
7) Distribution of Anti-retroviral therapy (emphasizing accessibility)
8) VCT – voluntary counseling & testing (emphasizing accessibility)
9) Hospital treatment for HIV patients

The NGOs were inquired on the above services. Additionally, we felt that it was equally important to actually observe these NGOs in action so to speak. In addition to the questionnaire we also set aside a separate guideline for observing. For example, we were taken on home-based care visits, requested to see the testing kits including the logs of patients receiving ARVS or Nevirapine. Once these organizations were interviewed and their activities observed, we compiled the resource guide, translated it into Muganda and distributed both English and Mugandan copies. A purpose for the team that developed over time was keeping in contact with these various NGOs. In the evenings and weekends, our team helped out a local orphanage (Iganga Self-Reliance Training & Rehabilitation Centre) by planting for their garden, interacting and spending time with the children, and supporting their income-generating activities of necklace-making.


Conclusions
 

The main inadequacy lies in the accessibility of treatment - transportation fees, lack of doctors/nurses, and CD4 cell count machines that simply did not work. We were informed that there were 2 CD4 cell count machines in the entire country and both were broken. According to the WHO, in order to be put on ARVS, two requirements must be met: CD4 cell count under 200 and Stage 3 disease diagnosis made by a doctor, not a medical officer. With the count machines broken, testing kits running low (and as we were informed, nonexistent for a two month period), and with 1 doctor per 75,000 people, this makes getting patients on ARV therapy a major challenge in the Ugandan health care system. Many non-governmental organizations based in the cities of Uganda that address HIV/AIDS issues, as well as other issues of community health, never conduct investigations into what is going on in the villages, where there is the least access to care. They do not know the issues that Ugandan villages face.  This is why Uganda Village Project's philosophy and position are unique. We feel that there must be more targeted outreach to these villages. The people living and working in Kampala refuse to go out to the villages because it is not ‘modernized’. This is unfortunate considering that the people in most need are not the ones living in the cities, but the ones in the farms.